Not Walking the Walk: How Dual Attitudes Influence Behavioral Outcomes in Ethical Consumption
Rahul Govind (),
Jatinder Jit Singh (),
Nitika Garg () and
Shachi D’Silva ()
Additional contact information
Rahul Govind: The University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney
Jatinder Jit Singh: EADA Business School
Nitika Garg: The University of New South Wales, UNSW Sydney
Shachi D’Silva: Reprise Media - Universal McCann
Journal of Business Ethics, 2019, vol. 155, issue 4, 1195-1214
Abstract Although consumers increasingly claim to demand ethical products and state that they are willing to reward firms that are ethical, studies have highlighted that there is a significant gap between consumers’ explicit attitudes toward ethical products and their actual purchase behavior. This has major implications for firm policies revolving around business ethics. This research contributes to the understanding of the attitude–behavior gap in ethical consumption that literature has identified but not explored much. We utilize the model of dual attitudes as a basis for the arguments presented in the paper and test them. We suggest that the gap in ethical consumerism exists because individuals have implicit as well as explicit attitudes, which are impacted differentially by stimuli and elicit dissimilar behavioral responses and thus have different implications for business ethics policies. Two longitudinal studies are conducted to better understand the impact of an individual’s dual attitudes on preferences and choice. Our findings support the presence of dual attitudes in consumers. Explicit attitudes are found to be easily influenced by the nature of the stimuli. On the other hand, implicit attitudes are relatively unaffected by the nature of the stimuli present and remain relatively constant. Based on the findings, implicit attitudes guide behavior and determine an individual’s preferences. Even though explicit attitudes react to the stimuli presented, our findings suggest they have no impact on the choice of consumers. These findings improve the understanding of ethical consumption, provide a reason as to why the attitude–behavior gap exists, provide a foundation for future researchers and help firms better understand the impact of perceived business on creating a behavioral shift in ethical consumption.
Keywords: Attitude–behavior gap; Ethical consumption; Dual attitudes; Implicit association test (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-017-3545-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:155:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s10551-017-3545-z
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10551/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Business Ethics is currently edited by Michelle Greenwood and R. Edward Freeman
More articles in Journal of Business Ethics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().