Active First Movers vs. Late Free-Riders? An Empirical Analysis of UN PRI Signatories’ Commitment

Tobias Bauckloh (t.bauckloh@uni-kassel.de), Stefan Schaltegger (stefan.schaltegger@leuphana.de), Sebastian Utz (sebastian.utz@unisg.ch), Sebastian Zeile (zeile@imug.de) and Bernhard Zwergel (b.zwergel@uni-kassel.de)
Additional contact information
Tobias Bauckloh: University of Kassel
Stefan Schaltegger: Leuphana University Lüneburg
Sebastian Utz: University of St. Gallen
Sebastian Zeile: imug rating GmbH
Bernhard Zwergel: University of Kassel

Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, vol. 182, issue 3, No 9, 747-781

Abstract: Abstract Joining voluntary thematic initiatives can be a means for firms to legitimate their business activities. However, a lack of review mechanisms could create incentives for free-riding. This might lead to a lower commitment to the initiative’s principles, and endanger its credibility and its members’ legitimacy benefits. Whether members of voluntary initiatives take advantage of the opportunity to free-ride has not been analyzed empirically so far. To fill this research gap, we investigate from an institutional theory perspective the actual implementation behavior of publicly listed signatories of the United Nations Principles for Responsible Investment (UN PRI) in a difference-in-differences and an event study setting. Our empirical results show that, after signing, UN PRI signatories integrate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria in their business activities significantly more than matched non-signatories from the financial sector, indicating the commitment of the signatories to the UN PRI in general. However, while the initial members show a high commitment to the initiative’s principles by increasing their ESG integration performance substantially, new members signing at a later stage of the initiative perform considerably less, and thus undermine the UN PRI’s credibility. We derive implications for voluntary thematic initiatives to avoid such a development.

Keywords: Voluntary initiatives; Free-riding; Institutional theory; UN principles for responsible investment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-021-04992-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:182:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-021-04992-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10551/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04992-0

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Ethics is currently edited by Michelle Greenwood and R. Edward Freeman

More articles in Journal of Business Ethics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com) and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (indexing@springernature.com).