StoneRidge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta: A Test of Auditor Litigation Risk

Anna Bergman Brown (), Nicole M. Heron (), Hagit Levy () and Emanuel Zur ()
Additional contact information
Anna Bergman Brown: Clarkson University
Nicole M. Heron: Suffolk University
Hagit Levy: City University of New York
Emanuel Zur: University of Maryland

Journal of Business Ethics, 2023, vol. 187, issue 3, No 6, 517-538

Abstract: Abstract This paper examines the effects of a decrease in auditor litigation risk in a setting that isolates a change in auditor litigation risk from changes in auditor reputation. StoneRidge Investment Partners v. Scientific Atlanta is a 2008 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that restricted secondary actor liability in class action suits, resulting in a decrease in class actions that listed auditors as defendants. We document that the StoneRidge decision is associated with a negative CAR for clients of Big 4 auditors and industry specialist auditors, in particular those associated with high-litigation risk, low cash, and past incidences of modified going concern opinions. These findings are consistent with investor perception of lower potential payoffs from secondary defendants in class action suits, in particular auditors, following the StoneRidge decision. We also document that auditors are more (less) likely to accept (reject) risky clients and charge lower audit fees to risky clients after StoneRidge, consistent with a decrease in auditor litigation risk that increases auditor risk tolerance. Finally, we provide evidence that audit firms issue fewer going concern opinions following StoneRidge, consistent with a decrease in litigation risk leading to lower audit quality. Our results are relevant to policy makers as they consider the disciplinary role of litigation on audit markets.

Keywords: Auditor; Litigation Risk; Corporate governance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-022-05267-y Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:187:y:2023:i:3:d:10.1007_s10551-022-05267-y

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10551/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-022-05267-y

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Ethics is currently edited by Michelle Greenwood and R. Edward Freeman

More articles in Journal of Business Ethics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().