The Duty Speech Loophole in Whistleblower Protection: Why We Need Retroactive Causality to Avoid Moral Luck

Wim Vandekerckhove () and Geert Demuijnck ()
Additional contact information
Wim Vandekerckhove: EDHEC Business School
Geert Demuijnck: EDHEC Business School

Journal of Business Ethics, 2025, vol. 199, issue 1, No 3, 37-53

Abstract: Abstract Key whistleblowing legislation in the US and EU remains ambiguous about protection for a specific (but important) group of employees, namely Role-Prescribed Reporters (RPR). An RPR is any worker who reports wrongdoing as part of their normal job duties, also known as duty speech. These workers are not whistleblowers when they report wrongdoing as part of their normal job. When they are neglected or experience retaliation they may report the same wrongdoing through a formally designated whistleblowing channel. We demonstrate how such situations amount to loopholes in whistleblower protection legislation. We discuss loopholes in the US (Whistleblower Protection Act, False Claims Act, Dodd-Frank Act) and the EU (Ireland, France, the Netherlands), in which an RPR does not enjoy whistleblower protection for any retaliation that occurred prior to using a formal channel. We argue the RPR exerts their function in a setting of uncertainty that, if they are unlucky, can lead to unfairness and situations of painful ‘agent-regret’ (which is an essential aspect of ‘moral luck’). Insofar as this uncertainty is perfectly avoidable, it is ethically unacceptable. We evaluate possible solutions and argue that reducing the scope of moral luck for RPRs (duty speech professionals) by retroactively attributing them a whistleblower status in the case of retaliation would close the currently prevailing legal loophole.

Keywords: Internal whistleblowing; Moral luck; Role-prescribed reporting; Whistleblowing legislation; Whistleblower protection (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10551-024-05842-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jbuset:v:199:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1007_s10551-024-05842-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10551/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10551-024-05842-5

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Business Ethics is currently edited by Michelle Greenwood and R. Edward Freeman

More articles in Journal of Business Ethics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().