The Regrettable Necessity of Contingent Valuation
Journal of Cultural Economics, 2003, vol. 27, issue 3, 259-274
Ordinary markets allow parties, not the state, to value property and projects. But they do not account for subjective value in such traditional contexts as condemnation. An awareness of these nonmarket values helps overcome any categorical opposition to the use of the contingent valuation method (CVM) to value cultural and environmental resources. But accurate CVM should measure all values, positive or negative, tononowners; it should apply generally to any substitute projects; and it should seek to account for diminishing marginal value of additional resource units. CVM should be used only to aggregate nonmarket preferences, not to skew the political debate to cultural or environmental objectives. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003
Keywords: contingent valuation; market valuations; public goods; subjective value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (20) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jculte:v:27:y:2003:i:3:p:259-274
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10824/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Cultural Economics is currently edited by Kathryn Graddy and Samuel Cameron
More articles in Journal of Cultural Economics from Springer, The Association for Cultural Economics International Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().