Determining the Value of Cultural Goods: How Much (or How Little) Does Contingent Valuation Tell Us?
David Throsby ()
Journal of Cultural Economics, 2003, vol. 27, issue 3, 275-285
Contingent valuation methods (CVM) are now well established as a means of measuring the nonmarket demand for cultural goods and services. When combined with valuations provided through market processes (where relevant), an overall assessment of the economic value of cultural commodities can be obtained. Within a neoclassical framework, such assessments are thought to provide a complete picture of the value of cultural goods. But are there aspects of the value of cultural goods which are not fully captured, or not captured at all, within such a model? This paper argues that CVM provides an incomplete view of the nonmarket value of cultural goods, and that alternative measures need to be developed to provide a fuller account. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003
Keywords: contingent valuation; cultural goods; cultural value; economic value (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (46) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jculte:v:27:y:2003:i:3:p:275-285
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/10824/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Cultural Economics is currently edited by Kathryn Graddy and Samuel Cameron
More articles in Journal of Cultural Economics from Springer, The Association for Cultural Economics International Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().