A Reappraisal of Strategic Trade Policy
Elizabeth Schroeder () and
Victor Tremblay ()
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 2015, vol. 15, issue 4, 435-442
We investigate the welfare effect of an export subsidy/tax in the “third market” trade model. The conventional wisdom is that an export subsidy increases home welfare in a Cournot setting (Brander and Spencer 1985) and an export tax increases home welfare in a Bertrand setting (Eaton and Grossman 1985). By allowing firms to compete in a Cournot-Bertrand duopoly model where one firm competes in output and the other competes in price, we are able to show that the conventional wisdom is incomplete. Optimal trade policy does not depend simply on whether firms compete in a Cournot or Bertrand type game. It only depends on whether the foreign firm competes in output or price. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015
Keywords: Strategic trade policy; Cournot-Bertrand model; C72; D43; F11; F13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jincot:v:15:y:2015:i:4:p:435-442
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/10842/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade is currently edited by Karl Aiginger, Marcel Canoy and Michael Peneder
More articles in Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().