Composition versus decomposition in two-stage network DEA: a reverse approach

Dimitris Despotis (), Gregory Koronakos and Dimitrios Sotiros

Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2016, vol. 45, issue 1, 87 pages

Abstract: A two-stage production process assumes that the first stage transforms external inputs to a number of intermediate measures, which then are used as inputs to the second stage that produces the final outputs. The fundamental approaches to two-stage network data envelopment analysis are the multiplicative and the additive efficiency-decomposition approaches. Both they assume a series relationship between the two stages but they differ in the definition of the overall system efficiency as well as in the way they conceptualize the decomposition of the overall efficiency to the efficiencies of the individual stages. In this paper, we first show that the efficiency estimates obtained by the additive decomposition method are biased, by unduly favouring one stage against the other, while those obtained by the multiplicative method are not unique. Then, we present a novel approach to estimate unique and unbiased efficiency scores for the individual stages, which are then composed to obtain the efficiency of the overall system, by selecting the aggregation method a posteriori. Within the particularity of two-stage processes emerging from the conflicting role of the intermediate measures, we develop an envelopment model to locate the efficient frontier whose derivation from our primal multiplier efficiency assessment model is effectively justified. The results derived from our approach are compared with those obtained by the aforementioned basic methods on experimental data as well as on test data drawn from the literature. Similarities and dissimilarities in the results are rigorously justified. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Keywords: Data envelopment analysis (DEA); Two-stage process; Network DEA; Decomposition; Composition; Efficient frontier; C61; C67 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (39)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11123-014-0415-x (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jproda:v:45:y:2016:i:1:p:71-87

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11123/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11123-014-0415-x

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Productivity Analysis is currently edited by William Greene, Chris O'Donnell and Victor Podinovski

More articles in Journal of Productivity Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().