EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The sensitivity of efficiency scores to input and other choices in stochastic frontier analysis: an empirical investigation

Quang Nguyen (), Sean Pascoe (), Louisa Coglan and Hong Son Nghiem
Additional contact information
Quang Nguyen: Ly Nhan Tong Street, Dinh Bang, Tu Son

Journal of Productivity Analysis, 2021, vol. 55, issue 1, No 3, 40 pages

Abstract: Abstract Productivity and efficiency analysis have gained substantial attention in many industries over the last two decades, and stochastic frontier analysis has been one of the most popular analytical approaches. The abundant model choices in stochastic frontier analysis make it difficult to select the best option and compare studies. The main purpose of this study is to examine the sensitivity of technical and scale efficiency estimates to choices around input-output combinations, functional forms, distributional assumptions and estimation methods in stochastic frontier analysis, using data from an Australian fishery to illustrate these effects. We estimated 252 stochastic frontier models using combinations of variable choice, functional form and distributional assumptions. A second stage analysis was conducted to examine the effects of model choices on statistical properties of technical and scale efficiency. The results show that estimates of technical and scale efficiency are most sensitive to distributional assumptions and the choice of time effects. In particular, the assumption of time-invariant efficiency produced significantly higher technical efficiency (20 percentage points) and scale efficiency (8 percentage points) scores than time-varying efficiency models in our analysis. We also find that the choice of fixed input variables can significantly affect the average efficiency estimates, by as much as 5 percentage points, but mean efficiency was not significantly affected by the choice of variable inputs. Our findings suggest that caution should be taken when comparing findings of stochastic frontier studies using different distributional and fixed input assumptions.

Keywords: Fisheries; Sensitivity analysis; Input variables; Stochastic frontier analysis; Choice of models; Q22; C51; C21 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11123-020-00592-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jproda:v:55:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11123-020-00592-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11123/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11123-020-00592-8

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Productivity Analysis is currently edited by William Greene, Chris O'Donnell and Victor Podinovski

More articles in Journal of Productivity Analysis from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2023-01-25
Handle: RePEc:kap:jproda:v:55:y:2021:i:1:d:10.1007_s11123-020-00592-8