The impact of formal agricultural education on farm level innovation and management practices
Cathal O’Donoghue and
Kevin Heanue ()
Additional contact information
Cathal O’Donoghue: Teagasc
Kevin Heanue: Teagasc
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Cathal O'donoghue ()
The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2018, vol. 43, issue 4, 844-863
Abstract Knowledge transfer in agriculture or what is conventionally known as agricultural extension is typically based on two activities: the delivery of education and the provision of advisory services. Formal agricultural education levels have steadily improved over time in Ireland and this growth in the human capital of the agricultural sector is a key aspect of the “smart” agenda set out in National Agricultural Development Strategies. In this paper we focus on the impact of one aspect of agricultural knowledge transfer process by considering the relationship between participation in formal agricultural education, farm level income outcomes and the pathways by which these outcomes are realised via innovation and management practice. In doing so, we contribute to the branch of the wider technology transfer literature concerned with identifying the impact of knowledge transfer activities and also understanding the role of competence building within knowledge transfer processes. Formal agricultural education can impact private returns in terms of improved technical and allocative efficiency. In most Irish agricultural sectors, we find a positive return to agricultural education and in particular a positive relationship in relation to technical efficiency in terms of improved yields. The result is, however, weak in the tillage sector. Evidence of improved allocative efficiency is in general weak, except for the commercial dairy sector. We do, however, find that earlier adopters of innovations or best management practice are more likely to have formal agricultural education. This may be due to reduced risk aversion, higher skills and better decision making. However, as mature technologies and management practices become mainstream across many farmer types, this relationship does not hold.
Keywords: Agricultural education; Innovation; Knowledge transfer; Returns to education (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I21 O30 I26 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10961-016-9529-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:43:y:2018:i:4:d:10.1007_s10961-016-9529-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nt/journal/10961/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
The Journal of Technology Transfer is currently edited by Albert N. Link, Donald S. Siegel, Barry Bozeman and Simon Mosey
More articles in The Journal of Technology Transfer from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().