How do firms shape their interactions with universities to build structural, human and relational capital? A mixed-method study of UK firms that interact with universities
Muthu Silva (),
Federica Rossi () and
Nicola Searle ()
Additional contact information
Muthu Silva: Birkbeck, University of London
Federica Rossi: University of Vaasa
Nicola Searle: Goldsmiths, University of London
The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2025, vol. 50, issue 4, No 11, 1633-1668
Abstract:
Abstract Universities are considered a key source of external resources for firms. Firms’ choices regarding the form of collaboration and how potential universities are approached, strongly influence how their partnerships with universities develop and succeed. We investigate how firms’ objectives to build three types of intellectual capital influence their prevalent mode of entering into interactions with universities. Building on a survey of 190 UK-based firms, we make an original contribution by demonstrating positive associations between: (A) structural capital-building objectives (i.e. sourcing resources and technologies required for research and development), and institutional mode of entry (i.e. directly contacting institutions of the university), mediated by the perceived functionality of acquisition channels (i.e. unidirectional transfer of resources from universities to firms); (B) relational capital-building (i.e. improving visibility and reputation), and the perceived functionality of co-creation channels (i.e. close working relationship between universities and firms), which in turn is positively associated with the frequency of use of individual modes of entry (i.e. directly contacting academics); (C) human capital-building (i.e. sourcing knowledge and associated networks) and both institutional and individual modes, mediated by the perceived functionality of, respectively, acquisition and co-creation channels (the latter when the firm intends to build new human capital, the former when it intends to exploit existing capital);. Our findings offer practical implications regarding how firms enter into relationships with universities depending on the firms’ objectives.
Keywords: University-business interaction; Acquisition; Co-creation; Structural capital; Relational capital; Human capital; Resource-based view (RBV) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10961-024-10150-1 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:50:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10961-024-10150-1
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nt/journal/10961/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-024-10150-1
Access Statistics for this article
The Journal of Technology Transfer is currently edited by Albert N. Link, Donald S. Siegel, Barry Bozeman and Simon Mosey
More articles in The Journal of Technology Transfer from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().