Carbon emission trading scheme and university technology transfer: does innovation quantity or quality matter?

Han Jiang (), Qing Zhou (), Chuan Hu () and Meng Tian ()
Additional contact information
Han Jiang: Hubei University of Technology
Qing Zhou: Hubei University of Technology
Chuan Hu: Zhongnan University of Economics and Law
Meng Tian: Hubei University of Technology

The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2025, vol. 50, issue 4, No 13, 1709-1738

Abstract: Abstract Carbon emission trading scheme (CETS) has been regarded as an important instrument by the Chinese government to address climate issues and achieve energy conservation and emission reduction. Currently, the impact of CETS on technological innovation has gained increased research interest. However, its further influence on university technology transfer, which is essential for the diffusion of technological innovation achievements, has been, until now, inadequately understood and analyzed. Building on the micro-data at the university level and employing a difference-in-differences model, this study explores the impact of CETS on university technology transfer and its underlying mechanism. Results show that CETS significantly facilitates university technology transfer. This outcome is still valid after considering the event study method, placebo test, instrumental variables method and a series of robustness tests. Then, we find that CETS can help promote university technology transfer by improving university innovation quality rather than innovation quantity. Further heterogeneous analyses demonstrate that a more pronounced effect occurs in the universities located in old industrial cities and cities with higher carbon emissions per capita, as well as in non-985 universities and universities with more technology transfer experience. In terms of individual pilot regions, the effect is more significant in four regions in China, including Beijing, Shanghai, Hubei and Guangdong. As for the carbon market characteristics, carbon trading price has a significantly positive effect on university technology transfer.

Keywords: Carbon emission trading scheme; University technology transfer; Innovation quantity; Innovation quality; Difference-in-differences (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: O31 O32 Q58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10961-024-10152-z Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jtecht:v:50:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s10961-024-10152-z

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... nt/journal/10961/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s10961-024-10152-z

Access Statistics for this article

The Journal of Technology Transfer is currently edited by Albert N. Link, Donald S. Siegel, Barry Bozeman and Simon Mosey

More articles in The Journal of Technology Transfer from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().