Beware of black swans: Taking stock of the description–experience gap in decision under uncertainty
André de Palma (),
Giuseppe Attanasi (),
Nathalie Picard (),
Joan Walker and
Marketing Letters, 2014, vol. 25, issue 3, 269-280
Uncertainty pervades most aspects of life. From selecting a new technology to choosing a career, decision makers rarely know in advance the exact outcomes of their decisions. Whereas the consequences of decisions in standard decision theory are explicitly described (the decision from description (DFD) paradigm), the consequences of decisions in the recent decision from experience (DFE) paradigm are learned from experience. In DFD, decision makers typically overrespond to rare events. That is, rare events have more impact on decisions than their objective probabilities warrant (overweighting). In DFE, decision makers typically exhibit the opposite pattern, underresponding to rare events. That is, rare events may have less impact on decisions than their objective probabilities warrant (underweighting). In extreme cases, rare events are completely neglected, a pattern known as the “Black Swan effect.” This contrast between DFD and DFE is known as a description–experience gap. In this paper, we discuss several tentative interpretations arising from our interdisciplinary examination of this gap. First, while a source of underweighting of rare events in DFE may be sampling error, we observe that a robust description–experience gap remains when these factors are not at play. Second, the residual description–experience gap is not only about experience per se but also about the way in which information concerning the probability distribution over the outcomes is learned in DFE. Econometric error theories may reveal that different assumed error structures in DFD and DFE also contribute to the gap. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Keywords: Black swans; Risk; Ambiguity; Fourfold pattern; (Non)-expected utility; Probabilistic choices; Experience-based decision making; Description-based decision making (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:269-280
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... etailsPage=societies
Access Statistics for this article
Marketing Letters is currently edited by Joel Steckel and Peter Golder
More articles in Marketing Letters from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().