Market outcomes regarding number and types of brand alliance partnerships
Anthony Koschmann () and
Faruk Anıl Konuk ()
Additional contact information
Anthony Koschmann: Eastern Michigan University
Faruk Anıl Konuk: Sakarya University
Marketing Letters, 2025, vol. 36, issue 4, No 1, 705-729
Abstract:
Abstract Brand alliances—or co-brands, which feature two brands in one offering—have grown as a strategic marketing tool. Yet, an unexamined aspect of this strategy is how many unique alliances a brand should be engaging in at one time. Is it better to have one exclusive partner, or have multiple offerings with different partners? Additionally, does this differ based on the type of alliance, namely, ingredient brand alliances (a fundamental change to the product) or symbolic brand alliances (often mere packaging changes)? Using large-scale panel purchase data covering 22 years, we find that engaging in multiple brand alliances yielded higher average aggregate market share for the brand, but single brand alliances had better average market share. Ingredient alliances also showed greater market share and positively moderated the number of alliances on total market share. Yet, there is a limiting return to alliance engagement, as too many alliances marginally lower total market share. The implication is if brands wish to grab as much market share as possible, brands should offer multiple products using alliances, but if brands seek efficiency, a single brand alliance should be pursued.
Keywords: Brand alliance; Co-branding; Single brand alliance; Multiple brand alliances; Ingredient branding; Symbolic branding; Brand strategy; Consumer packaged goods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11002-025-09791-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:mktlet:v:36:y:2025:i:4:d:10.1007_s11002-025-09791-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... etailsPage=societies
DOI: 10.1007/s11002-025-09791-5
Access Statistics for this article
Marketing Letters is currently edited by Joel Steckel and Peter Golder
More articles in Marketing Letters from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().