The Mistreated Model: A Reply

Anca Carrington ()

Open Economies Review, 2003, vol. 14, issue 1, 15-17

Abstract: This paper addresses the issues raised by Johnston et al. (2003) in relation to the spatial econometric treatment of the gravity model of trade in Porojan (2001). We show that the findings reported there are robust to alternative specifications. Furthermore, we indicate that the proposed formulation takes spatial effects into account while separating the impact of distance from far away trading partners from the 'neighborhood effect,' particularly within regional trading blocs. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 2003

Keywords: spatial econometrics; gravity model (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1023/A:1021290900364 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:openec:v:14:y:2003:i:1:p:15-17

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11079/PS2

DOI: 10.1023/A:1021290900364

Access Statistics for this article

Open Economies Review is currently edited by G.S. Tavlas

More articles in Open Economies Review from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().