Did the Bank of England’s Quantitative Easing Programme Become Fiscally Wasteful?
Michael Bleaney ()
Additional contact information
Michael Bleaney: University of Nottingham
Open Economies Review, 2025, vol. 36, issue 5, No 2, 1345-1363
Abstract:
Abstract In the period of central bank independence since 1997, the level of UK nominal interest rates has been driven almost entirely by real rates as reflected in the market for index-linked government bonds. These bonds offered a yield of + 4% in the 1980s, falling steadily to below -2% in late 2019, and only recovered somewhat in 2022, with long bond yields closely following short bond yields. The Bank of England doubled its purchases of bonds through its Quantitative Easing (QE) programme in 2020–21 at significantly negative real interest rates, taking up almost all of the increased supply associated with the massively increased budget deficit during the Covid-19 pandemic. Neither the Bank nor the Government bothered about the likely eventual fiscal cost, which rose quite steeply at the margin to the extent that the QE purchases had their intended effect of depressing bond yields. Much, but not all, of the blame for this lies with the Government, since under independence it is the Government that defines what the Bank should take into account in making its decisions about monetary policy. The issue of the eventual fiscal cost of QE is also of concern in the Euro Area and the United States.
Keywords: Central bank independence; Interest rates; Quantitative easing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E58 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11079-025-09798-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:openec:v:36:y:2025:i:5:d:10.1007_s11079-025-09798-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... cs/journal/11079/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11079-025-09798-5
Access Statistics for this article
Open Economies Review is currently edited by G.S. Tavlas
More articles in Open Economies Review from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().