EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The resource curse literature as seen through the appropriability lens: a critical survey

Mehrdad Vahabi

Public Choice, 2018, vol. 175, issue 3, No 10, 393-428

Abstract: Abstract This critical survey demonstrates for the first time that the underlying tenets of the resource curse/blessing are borrowed directly from “staple theory”. It also focuses uniquely on appropriability with two key issues in mind: (1) state appropriability of assets, and (2) the mobility of assets to thwart appropriation. In the previous resource curse literature, mobility has been framed using the concept of lootability. Appropriability is related to non-lootable assets, such as oil, that can be seized by the state or rival private oligarchs. Recent resource curse research has addressed appropriability by distinguishing between point-source resources and diffuse-source resources. This survey demonstrates that this distinction is borrowed from staple theory, and that point-source and diffuse-source resources are defined in terms of geographical concentration/dispersion rather than institutional characteristics. By establishing that political institutions, markets and incentives are the most important elements for determining appropriability, the resource curse/blessing literature could support a general positive theory of the predatory state.

Keywords: Captive and fugitive assets; Lootable goods; Natural resource curse; Point-source and diffuse-source resources; Predatory state; Staple theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: H1 H4 O1 Q1 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11127-018-0533-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The resource curse literature as seen through the appropriability lens: a critical survey (2018) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:175:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-018-0533-5

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11127-018-0533-5

Access Statistics for this article

Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II

More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:175:y:2018:i:3:d:10.1007_s11127-018-0533-5