The resource curse literature as seen through the appropriability lens: a critical survey

Mehrdad Vahabi

Post-Print from HAL

Abstract: There is a vast literature and several surveys on the economic and political resource curse. However, the surveys often fail to capture two points: 1) they disregard the relationship between this recent literature and the staple theory and the staple trap; 2) the appropriability issue has only been treated tangentially and has never been the focus of any survey. The present work fills these gaps. This paper shows that the political resource curse approach initially focused on the appropriability issue through the lens of 'looting' behavior of rebels and distinguished 'lootable' and 'unlootable' goods. However, lootability casts light on mobility of resources or resistance to appropriation rather than state appropriability. Borrowing upon Baldwin's distinction between 'point-source' and 'diffuse' resources, the resource curse literature has recently suggested that state appropriability is related to pointy-resources. The resource curse/blessing assumes that the technical dimension of appropriability and mobility (geographical or purely physical qualities) plays primary role whereas institutional dimensions are either absent or play a secondary role. An alternative approach gives pride of place to the institutional dimension: the same agricultural product such as cereals or coffee can be appropriable or not depending on the institutional structure. Finally, while the literature suffers from a confusion between mobility and appropriability, its relevance in enhancing an appropriative perspective of the state will be underlined.

Keywords: Captive and fugitive assets; Lootable goods; Natural resource curse; Pointy versus diffuse resources; Predatory state; Staple theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018-03-20
Note: View the original document on HAL open archive server: https://hal.science/hal-02242454
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Published in Public Choice, 2018, 175 (3-4), pp.393-428. ⟨10.1007/s11127-018-0533-5⟩

Downloads: (external link)
https://hal.science/hal-02242454/document (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The resource curse literature as seen through the appropriability lens: a critical survey (2018)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hal:journl:hal-02242454

DOI: 10.1007/s11127-018-0533-5

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Post-Print from HAL
Bibliographic data for series maintained by CCSD ().