EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Multiwinner approval voting: an apportionment approach

Steven Brams (), D. Marc Kilgour () and Richard F. Potthoff ()
Additional contact information
D. Marc Kilgour: Wilfrid Laurier University
Richard F. Potthoff: Duke University

Public Choice, 2019, vol. 178, issue 1, No 5, 67-93

Abstract: Abstract To ameliorate ideological or partisan cleavages in councils and legislatures, we propose modifications of approval voting in order to elect multiple winners, who may be either individuals or candidates of a political party. We focus on two divisor methods of apportionment, first proposed by Jefferson and Webster, that fall within a continuum of apportionment methods. Our applications of them depreciate the approval votes of voters who have had one or more approved candidates elected and give approximately proportional representation to political parties. We compare a simple sequential rule for allocating approval votes with a computationally more complex simultaneous (nonsequential) rule that, nonetheless, is feasible for many elections. We find that our Webster apportionments tend to be more representative than ours based on Jefferson—by giving more voters at least one representative of whom they approve. But our Jefferson apportionments, with equally spaced vote thresholds that duplicate those of cumulative voting in two-party elections, are more even-handed. By enabling voters to express support for more than one candidate or party, these apportionment methods will tend to encourage coalitions across party or factional lines, thereby diminishing gridlock and promoting consensus in voting bodies.

Keywords: Approval voting; Multiple winners; Apportionment; Divisor methods; Cumulative voting (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11127-018-0609-2 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Multi winner Approval Voting: An Apportionment Approach (2017) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:178:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-018-0609-2

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11127/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11127-018-0609-2

Access Statistics for this article

Public Choice is currently edited by WIlliam F. Shughart II

More articles in Public Choice from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:kap:pubcho:v:178:y:2019:i:1:d:10.1007_s11127-018-0609-2