GEM research: achievements and challenges
David Urbano () and
José Amorós Espinosa ()
Small Business Economics, 2014, vol. 42, issue 3, 445-465
This article analyzes the content and evolution of research based on the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) project. We conducted a rigorous search of articles published in journals within the Thomson Reuters’ Social Sciences Citation Index ® through an exploratory analysis focused on articles using GEM data. The main findings of this study reveal that the institutional approach is the most commonly used conceptual framework. Also, although there are still few academic publications using GEM data, the number of articles is increasing, as are opportunities for future research. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014
Keywords: Global entrepreneurship monitor; GEM; Literature review; Institutional approach; Social Sciences Citation Index; L26; B25; M13; O57 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:42:y:2014:i:3:p:445-465
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... 29/journal/11187/PS2
Access Statistics for this article
Small Business Economics is currently edited by Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch
More articles in Small Business Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla ().