Super Majoritarianism and the Endowment Effect

Uriel Procaccia () and Uzi Segal

Theory and Decision, 2003, vol. 55, issue 3, 207 pages

Abstract: The American and some other constitutions entrench property rights by requiring super majoritarian voting as a condition for amending or revoking their own provisions. Following Buchanan and Tullock [The Calculus of Consent, Logical Foundations of Constitutional Democracy (University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor), 1962], this paper analyzes individuals' interests behind a veil of ignorance, and shows that under some standard assumptions, a (simple) majoritarian rule should be adopted. This result changes if one assumes that preferences are consistent with the behavioral phenomenon known as the "endowment effect." It then follows that (at least some) property rights are best defended by super majoritarian protection. The paper then shows that its theoretical results are consistent with a number of doctrines underlying American Constitutional Law.

Date: 2003
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://journals.kluweronline.com/issn/0040-5833/contents (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Super Majoritarianism and the Endowment Effect (2002)
Working Paper: Super Majoritarianism and the Endowment Effect (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:theord:v:55:y:2003:i:3:p:181-207

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11238/PS2

Access Statistics for this article

Theory and Decision is currently edited by Mohammed Abdellaoui

More articles in Theory and Decision from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().