EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

No Switchbacks: Rethinking Aspiration-Based Dynamics in the Ultimatum Game

Jeffrey Carpenter and Peter Matthews

Theory and Decision, 2005, vol. 58, issue 4, 385 pages

Abstract: Aspiration-based evolutionary dynamics have recently been used to model the evolution of fair play in the ultimatum game showing that incredible threats to reject low offers persist in equilibrium. We focus on two extensions of this analysis: we experimentally test whether assumptions about agent motivations (aspiration levels) and the structure of the game (binary strategy space) reflect actual play, and we examine the problematic assumption embedded in the standard replicator dynamic that unhappy agents who switch strategies may return to a rejected strategy without exploring other options. We find that the resulting “no switchbackâ€\x9D dynamic predicts the evolution of play better than the standard dynamic and that aspirations are a significant motivator for our participants. In the process, we also construct and analyze a variant of the ultimatum game in which players can adopt conditional (on their induced aspirations) strategies. Copyright Springer 2005

Keywords: ultimatum game; learning; aspirations; replicator dynamics; experiment; C78; C91 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11238-005-0284-x (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: No Switchbacks: Rethinking Aspiration-Based Dynamics in the Ultimatum Game (2003) Downloads
Working Paper: No Switchbacks: Rethinking Aspiration-Based Dynamics in the Ultimatum Game (2002) Downloads
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:theord:v:58:y:2005:i:4:p:351-385

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11238/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11238-005-0284-x

Access Statistics for this article

Theory and Decision is currently edited by Mohammed Abdellaoui

More articles in Theory and Decision from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:kap:theord:v:58:y:2005:i:4:p:351-385