Assessing the influence of indicators’ complexity on hybrid discrete choice model estimates
Luis Márquez (),
Victor Cantillo and
Julian Arellana ()
Additional contact information
Luis Márquez: Universidad Pedagógica y Tecnológica de Colombia
Transportation, 2020, vol. 47, issue 1, No 15, 373-396
Abstract:
Abstract Hybrid discrete choice (HDC) modeling requires indicators to allow for the identification of latent variables. An indicator usually expresses the level of agreement of a respondent with a given statement, generally based on a Likert scale response. Literature exhibits remarkable variations regarding indicators’ complexity, expressed by the number of indicators for each latent variable, the type of scale, and granularity. Dealing with different levels of complexity implies that respondents require different cognitive efforts when choosing a relevant Likert point. Further, as a Likert item is undoubtedly a set of ordered categories, modelers face the challenge of estimating a large number of threshold parameters resulting from greater complexity when using ordered models for measurement equations. This paper studies the influence of indicators’ complexity on the estimation of HDC models based on an experiment that systematically varies the number of indicators, the granularity and the type of scale. We specified a proper parameterization of the scale factor of the measurement component for capturing potential effects of complexity in measurement equations. Findings revealed that granularity and its quadratic effect, as well as the interaction between granularity and number of indicators, affect the error variance of the measurement component and have a substantial impact on the goodness-of-fit of the discrete choice sub-model. Modeling results also showed that using odd-numbered scales, widely used in transportation choice studies, contribute to a lower error variance of the measurement component.
Keywords: Hybrid models; Structural equations; Heteroskedastic ordered logit model; Likert items; Safety perception (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (7)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11116-018-9891-6 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:transp:v:47:y:2020:i:1:d:10.1007_s11116-018-9891-6
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11116/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11116-018-9891-6
Access Statistics for this article
Transportation is currently edited by Kay W. Axhausen
More articles in Transportation from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().