Evaluation of Sports Achievements of Participants in Cheerleading Competitions by Rationalizing Refereeing

Tetiana Synytsya, Sergiy Synytsya, Lina Rybalko, Oksana Kornosenko and Valeriy Zhamardiy
Additional contact information
Tetiana Synytsya: PhD in Physical Education and Sport, Assistant Professor of the Department of Physical Culture and Sports, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic», Poltava, Ukraine
Sergiy Synytsya: PhD in Physical Education and Sport, Assistant Professor of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Physical Education, Adaptive and Mass Physical Culture, Poltava V. G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University, Poltava, Ukraine
Lina Rybalko: Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Physical Culture and Sports, National University «Yuri Kondratyuk Poltava Polytechnic», Poltava, Ukraine
Oksana Kornosenko: Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Professor, Head of the Department of Theory and Methodology of Physical Education, Adaptive and Mass Physical Culture, Poltava V. G. Korolenko National Pedagogical University, Poltava, Ukraine
Valeriy Zhamardiy: Doctor of Pedagogical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Poltava State Medical University, Poltava, Ukraine

Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, 2024, vol. 16, issue 1, 326-342

Abstract: Cheerleading is a popular sport that is developing and increasing the number of fans. Cheerleading is a subjective sport and therefore it requires a lot of attention. The aim of the study is to investigate, identify and scientifically substantiate effective ways of rationalizing the refereeing of cheerleading competitions. 105 cheerleading judges took part in the study. Based on the results of the survey, an experimental group of judges of II and III categories was formed, which consisted of 73 young judges (hereinafter referred to as novice judges), who were involved in the experiment. Among them, 35.6% have the II judge category, 64.4% – III. Among novice judges, 23.3% have 3 years of experience as judges, 42.5% – 2 years, the rest – 31.2% – 1 year. The conducted questionnaire of cheerleading judges showed that certain difficulties arise in the judging process: distraction of own athletes and their parents, judges or competition organizers (72.6%); a large number of athletes in the team (up to 24), a significant number of numbers in one nomination (11.0%); long and loud music (8.2%); violation of hygiene requirements (weak or significant lighting, unventilated room, draft, etc.) (8.2%). In addition, there is a need to store the performances in memory, for a qualitative assessment of all competitive performances. As a result of the conducted research, methodical recommendations were developed, as well as developed evaluation symbols and marks for use during competition that will help judges to qualitatively and fairly evaluate competitive performances; remember performances and correctly distribute participants.

Keywords: judge; competition; cheerleading; training; evaluation; improvement (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I2 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/article/view/6402/4768 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:16:y:2024:i:1:p:326-342

DOI: 10.18662/rrem/16.1/825

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education from Editura Lumen, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antonio Sandu ().