Socioformation and the Formative Evaluation in Engineering

Maria de Lourdes RODRIGUEZ PERALTA (), Juan Salvador NAMBO de Los Santos () and Jesus RODRIGUEZ Buendia ()
Additional contact information
Maria de Lourdes RODRIGUEZ PERALTA: ESIME UC del Instituto Politecnico Nacional
Juan Salvador NAMBO de Los Santos: Centro de Ciencia e Innovacion para la Formacion y el Emprendimiento
Jesus RODRIGUEZ Buendia: ESIME UC del Instituto Politecnico Nacional

Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education, 2018, vol. 10, issue 1, 210-227

Abstract: The society demands nowadays that the educational models of the institutions at the university level focus in an integral formation developing knowledge, skills and competences. Nevertheless, the systems of evaluation are not necessarily according to the requirements and methods of teaching and learning in the classroom. This investigation describes the effect of implementing a checklist as a medium so that the student acquires knowledge and gives feedback on the process of teaching and learning, promoting the integral formation. The checklist was designed under the socioformative approach and was used as a mean for the formative evaluation and shared during a course of differential and integral calculus. The qualitative investigation of analytical and descriptive type was based on the action-investigation, with students of the Career of Engineering on Communications and Electronics of Instituto Politécnico Nacional. Among the obtained results, it turns out that the students had a better academic performance and a change of attitude towards the learning of the mathematics in engineering, because they can take the control and the regulation of it. Concluding, we can say that the instruments of evaluation constructed under the socioformative approach promote the formative and participative evaluation and are a good way to improve the academic performance of the student and to develop competences like the collaborative work, the resolution of problems and the autonomy in the learning. It becomes necessary to continue the research regarding the design of instruments of formative evaluation as a didactic medium and the roles that the teachers and students must follow in order to promote an integral formation from the socioformative approach.

Keywords: Socioformation; formative evaluation; integral formation and engineering; mathematics and engineering (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: A23 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lumenpublishing.com/journals/index.php/rrem/article/view/596/pdf (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lum:rev1rl:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:210-227

DOI: 10.18662/rrem/29

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Revista romaneasca pentru educatie multidimensionala - Journal for Multidimensional Education from Editura Lumen, Department of Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Antonio Sandu ().