Rushing to Copenhagen?

Koushik Ghosh and Peter Gray

Challenge, 2010, vol. 53, issue 1, 5-27

Abstract: To listen to the public discourse about how to control emissions, one might think there is near-unanimity that cap-and-trade is the answer. Set limits on carbon emissions, provide business with the ability to trade rights to pollute, and the market will efficiently spread the costs of pollution control. These economists beg to differ. Read why.

Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.2753/0577-5132530101 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:challe:v:53:y:2010:i:1:p:5-27

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MCHA20

DOI: 10.2753/0577-5132530101

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Challenge from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().