Family Control and Debt When Dual-Class Shares Are Restricted: The Case of Poland

Tomasz Jewartowski and Michał Kałdoński

Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 2015, vol. 51, issue 1, 174-187

Abstract: Our research, based on an unbalanced panel of 105 companies listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange during 2006–10, demonstrates that public family firms are, on average, more levered than nonfamily firms and more extensively use control-enhancing mechanisms (CEMs), resulting in a wedge between control (voting) rights and cash flow rights. We decompose the total wedge for family firms into a standard dual-class shares component and a disproportionate board representation component finding inverse relations between each of them and the debt levels (positive for the former and negative for the latter). When dual-class shares are restricted—as in the case of Polish companies once they become public—financial decisions may be driven by control motivations. Family firms have strong incentives to use debt as a nondiluting security.

Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/1540496X.2015.1011529 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:emfitr:v:51:y:2015:i:1:p:174-187

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MREE20

DOI: 10.1080/1540496X.2015.1011529

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Emerging Markets Finance and Trade from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().