Responses to Lavoie, King, and Dow on what Post Keynesianism is and who is a Post Keynesian

Paul Davidson

Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2005, vol. 27, issue 3, 393-408

Abstract: This paper responds to the criticism that many heterodox economists, who want to be labeled as Post Keynesians, are rejected by my defining Post Keynesian theory as limited to those theories that adopt Keynes's analytical framework of aggregate demand and supply functions derived from the rejection of three restrictive classical axioms--that is, the gross substitution axiom, the neutral money axiom, and the ergodic axiom (or ordering axiom in deterministic models).

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2005.11051447 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:postke:v:27:y:2005:i:3:p:393-408

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MPKE20

DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2005.11051447

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Post Keynesian Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().