A history of Post Keynesian economics since 1936: some hard (and not so hard) questions for the future

Giuseppe Fontana

Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2005, vol. 27, issue 3, 409-421

Abstract: This paper discusses three controversial questions to which I was naturally led by the reading of John E. King's A History of Post Keynesian Economics Since 1936 (2002). First, did King unduly play down the role of the second generation of Post Keynesian economists? Second, how revolutionary were Keynes's writings, and how radical should Post Keynesian economics be? Finally, what is the future of Post Keynesian economics?

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2005.11051443 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:postke:v:27:y:2005:i:3:p:409-421

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MPKE20

DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2005.11051443

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Post Keynesian Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().