Reorienting history (of economics)

Tony Lawson ()

Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2005, vol. 27, issue 3, 455-470

Abstract: In his response to my original paper "The (Confused) State of Equilibrium Analysis in Modern Economics: An Explanation," Weintraub sets forth a competing account of the nature of equilibrium theorizing in economics. Weintraub supposes (1) his account is better because (2) his approach to understanding economics is more historical than my own. I suggest that neither of these claims is correct.

Date: 2005
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2005.11051445 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:postke:v:27:y:2005:i:3:p:455-470

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MPKE20

DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2005.11051445

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Post Keynesian Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().