Mainstream economics: searching where the light is

Rogier De Langhe

Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2009, vol. 32, issue 1, 137-150

Abstract: The starting point of this paper is the question of how to explain mainstream economics' great level of acceptance in the face of its poor empirical track record. An explanation is provided in terms of a combination of unification and, most importantly, inference to the best explanation. This paper asks whether the appeal of mainstream economics to inference to the best explanation is justified and as a consequence questions one of the main reasons for the dominance of mainstream economics today. The final section integrates the ideas from the previous sections into a general framework for explanatory pluralism.

Keywords: explanatory pluralism; inference to the best explanation; mainstream economics; unification (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://mesharpe.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=RU48R30G0J7U7922 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:postke:v:32:y:2009:i:1:p:137-150

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MPKE20

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Post Keynesian Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().