The illusions of calculating total factor productivity and testing growth models: from Cobb-Douglas to Solow and Romer

Jesus Felipe () and John McCombie

Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2020, vol. 43, issue 3, 470-513

Abstract: Growth models in the tradition of Solow and Romer are framed in terms of production functions. Consequently, they are equally subject to a criticism developed by, among others, Phelps Brown, Simon, and Samuelson. These authors argued that production function estimations are flawed exercises because output, labor and capital stock, are definitionally related through an accounting identity. The identity argument helps demystify two illusions in the literature: (i) finding the Holy Grail: total factor productivity is, by construction, a weighted average of dollars per worker and a pure number (the rate of profit or the rental rate of capital); and (ii) the possibility of testing: if estimated properly, production function regressions will yield: (a) a very high fit, potentially an R2 of unity; and (b) estimated factor elasticities equal to the factor shares, hence they must always add up to 1. We illustrate these points through a series of well-known growth accounting exercises and models directly derived from production functions. They are futile exercises. We conclude that we know substantially less than we think about growth and that many of the discussions in the neoclassical growth literature are Kuhnian puzzles that only make sense within this paradigm.

Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2020.1774393 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: The Illusions of Calculating Total Factor Productivity and Testing Growth Models: From Cobb–Douglas to Solow and Romer (2019)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:postke:v:43:y:2020:i:3:p:470-513

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MPKE20

DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2020.1774393

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Post Keynesian Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().