Wynne Godley’s monetary circuit
Marc Lavoie
Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 2021, vol. 44, issue 1, 6-23
Abstract:
This article outlines the main points of full agreement between Wynne Godley and I. These explain why we managed to complete the task of writing our book Monetary Economics. The main points are the following: we had an identical conception of pricing procedures and the lack of impact of demand on prices relative to normal unit costs; we both had identified the compensation thesis in our previous work, that is, the belief that balance-of-payment surpluses have no impact on the stock of high-powered money in an economy set in a fixed-exchange-rate regime, in contrast to the Mundell–Fleming model; we both held very similar views about the endogeneity of the money supply and the essential role of banks versus the rest of the financial institutions; and finally, we both held a view of the monetary production economy that was in line with that presented by French circuit theorists and Augusto Graziani. This last point is developed in more detail, as it is pointed out that a number of scholars now combine the stock-flow consistent approach of Godley with the theory of the monetary circuit.
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/01603477.2020.1840284 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mes:postke:v:44:y:2021:i:1:p:6-23
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.tandfonline.com/pricing/journal/MPKE20
DOI: 10.1080/01603477.2020.1840284
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Post Keynesian Economics from Taylor & Francis Journals
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Longhurst ().