Superstardom and Monopolistic Power: Why Media Stars Earn More Than Their Marginal Contribution to Welfare
Lex Borghans and
Loek Groot ()
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 1998, vol. 154, issue 3, 546-
In this paper we develop in two steps an argument which shows that superstar incomes exceed their marginal contribution to welfare. Firstly, we argue that superstar incomes can only exist if two conditions are met: There should indeed be differences in talent; but also superstars must be able to exploit monopolistic power due to their number-one position. Secondly, we introduce an elementary probabilistic model that shows that the existence of such monopolistic power explains the stylized facts concerning superstars, while the presumption that high incomes are completely generated by differences in talent, is rejected by this model.
JEL-codes: D62 J31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (29) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Fulltext access is included for subscribers to the printed version.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(199809)154:3_546:sampwm_2.0.tx_2-p
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG, P.O.Box 2040, 72010 Tübingen, Germany
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) is currently edited by Gerd Mühlheußer and Bayer, Ralph-C
More articles in Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) from Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Wolpert ().