Toward a Theory of Motion Practice and Settlement

Scott Baker

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE), 2017, vol. 173, issue 1, 144-162

Abstract: A model studies the relationship between pretrial dispositive motions, settlement, and discovery. The trial court, defendant, and plaintiff start uncertain about what the jury might think of the defendant's carelessness. The plaintiff is optimistic about her prospects at trial. The degree of optimism is private information. Discovery yields partial information that allows the parties to update their assessment of what the jury might decide if granted the opportunity (i.e., if the case does not settle). We find that settlement offers increase following the denial of the defendant's motion for summary judgment. We also study the impact of increasing the threshold of plausibility the plaintiff's complaint needs to survive the defendant's motion to dismiss.

JEL-codes: K41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.mohrsiebeck.com/en/article/toward-a-th ... 45616x14785139251701 (text/html)
Fulltext access is included for subscribers to the printed version.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mhr:jinste:urn:sici:0932-4569(201703)173:1_144:tatomp_2.0.tx_2-o

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Mohr Siebeck GmbH & Co. KG, P.O.Box 2040, 72010 Tübingen, Germany

DOI: 10.1628/093245616X14785139251701

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) is currently edited by Gerd Mühlheußer and Bayer, Ralph-C

More articles in Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE) from Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Wolpert ().