 Participatory Research: Still a One-Sided Research Agenda?Derya Ozkul
Migration Letters, 2020, vol. 17, issue 2, 10 Abstract: Despite the prevalence of the term over the last two decades, scholars have not agreed on a definition of, or approach towards, participation, although critiques have emphasised that participation is not an equal process for all parties involved. By reviewing the literature and giving examples from fieldwork carried out in Lebanon, this article agrees with the common critique around participation and reflects over the limitations resulting from inherent power imbalances between researchers and participants and among community members. It also argues that the “glorification of methods” alone disguises the politics and the one-sided nature of participatory research and disregards the question of to what extent participants are involved in the construction of the methodology. This article suggests that –despite the pressure from funders to find out innovative methods –participatory researchers would benefit from understanding participants’ own ways of conceptualising and investigating a phenomenon, in order tobuild their methodology. This article explores these questions, particularly in research with migrants and refugees. Keywords: qualitative methods; participatory research; migrants; refugees; creative methods (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mig:journl:v:17:y:2020:i:2:p:229-237 Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from Access Statistics for this article Migration Letters is currently edited by Kittisak Jermsittiparsert More articles in Migration Letters from Migration Letters |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.