Japanese responses to asset price bubbles: comparison with the U.S

Ryozo Himino

Public Policy Review, 2016, vol. 12, issue 2, 253-290

Abstract: It is widely believed that the Japanese response to the boom and the bust in the late 1980s and early 1990s was too little and too late, while that of the US in the 2000 was decisive and timely. Though such may have been the case with the bailing out of large banks and the recognition and resolution of bad assets, the monetary policy responses in Japan and the U.S. before and after the real estate price peaks closely resemble each other in their i) size and timing of tightening and easing, ii) deviation from the Taylor targets and iii) responses to asset price impulse. Prudential policies in Japan and the US also were common in that they i) started with qualitative guidance on real estate lending in the early phases of the bubble, ii) added layers of qualitative guidance as the bubble grew, and iii) stepped into quantitative guidance only after the initial signs of peaking-out. Though the Japanese authorities are believed to have gleaned h to prick the bubble while the U.S. authorities argued against leaning and advocated gcleaning up h the mess after the bust, their behavior did not differ much. Intention, action and effects staggered with each other and both monetary and prudential policies in Japan and in the U.S. lagged behind the real estate price moves and may have deepened the bust. Timeliness of the policy responses may matter more than how they are motivated, explained or labelled: clean or lean, microor macro-prudential.

Keywords: asset price bubbles; monetary policy; prudential policy; clean; lean (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: E52 G01 G28 N25 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://warp.da.ndl.go.jp/info:ndljp/pid/11217434/ ... y2015/ppr012_02d.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mof:journl:ppr012_02d

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Policy Review from Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Policy Research Institute ().