Significance of “Special and Differential Treatment” in the Free Trade System: From the Perspective of the Theory of Plurality of Norms

Satoshi Kodera
Additional contact information
Satoshi Kodera: Professor, Faculty of Law, Seinan Gakuin University

Public Policy Review, 2024, vol. 20, issue 1, 1-27

Abstract: This paper examines the significance of “special and differential treatment” (S&D) in the current and future free trade system from the perspective of the theory of plurality of norms. Firstly, it provides an overview of the theory of plurality of norms, which has been used in international law to cross-sectionally analyse the relationship between developed and developing countries across multiple treaty systems. Based on this theory, it clarifies the components and characteristics of S&D in the World Trade Organization (WTO) distinct from the provisions related to developing countries in the General Agreement on Tarrifs and Trade (GATT). Next, this paper examines the changes in the circumstances surrounding S&D, which has become prominent since the 2000s. After analysing the criticisms against S&D in recent years, it will consider S&D in the WTO Trade Facilitation Agreement, which is attracting attention as a model for the future. Furthermore, it compares S&D under this agreement with the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities (CBDR) in the Paris Agreement on climate change. It analyses the significance and issues of the “double self-election approach” that is perceived as common to both systems.

Keywords: plurality of norms; special and differential treatment; international law of development; World Trade Organization; development; Trade Facilitation Agreement; double self-election approach (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: F13 K33 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.57520/prippr.20-4-1 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mof:journl:ppr20_04_01

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Policy Review from Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Finance Japan Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Policy Research Institute ().