Mergers and National Champions

Massimo Motta () and Michele Ruta

L'industria, 2008, issue 2, 245-270

Abstract: The suspicion that national governments were in various forms promoting or defending domestic national champions (or discouraging foreign ones) arose in a long list of recent merger cases. This paper provides an analysis of the determinants of merger policy in international markets. We discuss two approaches. First, we examine the strategic policy arguments that may lie behind "national champions" positions on mergers in an international economy. Second, we study a political economy approach to merger policy, where we move beyond the assumption that governments are pure welfare-maximizers and consider the effects of lobbying by domestic firms. We argue that standard "strategic trade policy" arguments are probably not the most useful in understanding governments' attitudes towards mergers. Rather, a combination of "economic" and "political" motives helps explaining merger policy in international markets.

Keywords: Mergers; Antitrust Policy; Lobbying; European Union (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1430/27264 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1430/27264 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:j0hje1:doi:10.1430/27264:y:2008:i:2:p:245-270

Access Statistics for this article

L'industria is currently edited by Patrizio Bianchi

More articles in L'industria from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().