Economics at your fingertips  

The Influence of Gender and Household Culture on Financial Literacy Knowledge; Attitudes and Behaviour

Stephen Agnew and Trudi Cameron-Agnew
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Steve Agnew

Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions, 2015, issue 1, 31-50

Abstract: This study of over 500 fifteen year old high school students in New Zealand found that boys have earlier financial discussions with their parents than girls, with the age of first discussion having a significant impact on financial literacy quiz scores for boys, but not for girls. Boys were found to have more positive attitudes than girls about financial matters, specifically around saving and spending. Boys were also found to impulse spend less than girls. Impulse spending behaviour of girls could be mitigated to a certain extent by the education level of the girls' mothers, while a more educated father is correlated with a higher financial literacy quiz score for both boys and girls, after controlling for socioeconomic status. It is suggested that parents need to be aware of how gender stereotypes, and the «financial culture» in the home ultimately impacts on the financial knowledge, attitudes and behaviours of their children.

Keywords: Financial Literacy; Gender; Parents; Financial Discussions; Financial Attitudes. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf) (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Financial Management, Markets and Institutions from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().

Page updated 2023-06-15
Handle: RePEc:mul:jdp901:doi:10.12831/80529:y:2015:i:1:p:31-50