The Statist Neo-Institutionalism of Acemoglu and Robinson

Deirdre Nansen McCloskey

Rivista di storia economica, 2021, issue 2, 151-189

Abstract: In a long review of Acemoglu and Robinson’s 2019 The Narrow Corridor McCloskey praises their scholarship but criticizes their relentless statism – their enthusiasm for a bigger and bigger Stato, so long as it is somehow «caged». Their case is mechanical, materialist, and structuralist, none of which is a good guide to history or politics. Their theory of social causation mixes up necessary with sufficient conditions, though they are not unusual among political scientists and economists in doing so. They downplay the role of ideas, which after all made the modern world through liberalism. They recognize how dangerous the modern «capable» State can be, what they call The Leviathan, after Hobbes. But their construal of «liberty» is the provision of goodies to children by a beneficent Leviathan. It is not the adultism that in fact made the modern world of massive enrichment and true liberty. Their vision is deeply illiberal, and mistaken as science.

Keywords: neo-institutionalism; political economy Acemoglu; Robinson; liberalism (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/download/article/10.1410/101294 (application/pdf)
https://www.rivisteweb.it/doi/10.1410/101294 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:mul:jrkmxm:doi:10.1410/101294:y:2021:i:2:p:151-189

Access Statistics for this article

Rivista di storia economica is currently edited by P.L. Ciocca, G. Federico, G. Toniolo (resp.)

More articles in Rivista di storia economica from Società editrice il Mulino
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().