Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox

Thomas Breda (), Elyès Jouini (), Clotilde Napp and Georgia Thebault
Additional contact information
Georgia Thebault: Paris School of Economics, 75014 Paris, France; CNRS, UMR8545, 75014 Paris, France; Ecole des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales, 75006 Paris, France

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2020, vol. 117, issue 49, 31063-31069

Abstract: The so-called “gender-equality paradox” is the fact that gender segregation across occupations is more pronounced in more egalitarian and more developed countries. Some scholars have explained this paradox by the existence of deeply rooted or intrinsic gender differences in preferences that materialize more easily in countries where economic constraints are more limited. In line with a strand of research in sociology, we show instead that it can be explained by cross-country differences in essentialist gender norms regarding math aptitudes and appropriate occupational choices. To this aim, we propose a measure of the prevalence and extent of internalization of the stereotype that “math is not for girls” at the country level. This is done using individual-level data on the math attitudes of 300,000 15-y-old female and male students in 64 countries. The stereotype associating math to men is stronger in more egalitarian and developed countries. It is also strongly associated with various measures of female underrepresentation in math-intensive fields and can therefore entirely explain the gender-equality paradox. We suggest that economic development and gender equality in rights go hand-in-hand with a reshaping rather than a suppression of gender norms, with the emergence of new and more horizontal forms of social differentiation across genders.

Keywords: gender gap in STEM; gender stereotypes; socioeconomic development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.pnas.org/content/117/49/31063.full (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox (2020)
Working Paper: Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox (2020)
Working Paper: Gender Stereotypes Can Explain the Gender-Equality Paradox (2020)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nas:journl:v:117:y:2020:p:31063-31069

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Bibliographic data for series maintained by PNAS Product Team ().