Severe chemical ozone loss in the Arctic during the winter of 1995–96

Rolf Müller (), Paul J. Crutzen, Jens-Uwe Grooβ, Christoph Bürhl, James M. Russell, Hartwig Gernandt, Daniel S. McKenna and Adrian F. Tuck
Additional contact information
Rolf Müller: Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute for Stratospheric Chemistry (ICG-1)
Paul J. Crutzen: Max Planck Institut für Chemie
Jens-Uwe Grooβ: Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute for Stratospheric Chemistry (ICG-1)
Christoph Bürhl: Max Planck Institut für Chemie
James M. Russell: Hampton University
Hartwig Gernandt: Alfred Wegener Institut
Daniel S. McKenna: Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute for Stratospheric Chemistry (ICG-1)
Adrian F. Tuck: NOAA Aeronomy Laboratory

Nature, 1997, vol. 389, issue 6652, 709-712

Abstract: Abstract Severe stratospheric ozone depletion is the result of perturbations of chlorine chemistry owing to the presence of polar stratospheric clouds (PSCs) during periods of limited exchange of air between the polar vortex and midlatitudes and partial exposure of the vortex to sunlight1,2,3,4. These conditions are consistently encountered over Antarctica during the austral spring. In the Arctic, extensive PSC formation occurs only during the coldest winters, when temperatures fall as low as those regularly found in the Antarctic1,5,6. Moreover, ozone levels in late winter and early spring are significantly higher than in the corresponding austral season1,7,8, and usually strongly perturbed by atmospheric dynamics9,10,11,12. For these reasons, chemical ozone loss in the Arctic is difficult to quantify. Here we use the correlation between CH4 and O3 in the Arctic polar vortex to discriminate between changes in ozone concentration due to chemical and dynamical effects10. Our results indicate that 120–160 Dobson units (DU) of ozone were chemically destroyed between January and March 1996—a loss greater than observed in Antarctica in 1985, when the ‘ozone hole’ was first reported13,14. This loss outweighs the expected increase in total ozone over the same period through dynamical effects, leading to an observed6 net decrease of about 50 DU. This ozone loss arises through the simultaneous occurrence of extremely low Arctic stratospheric temperatures6,15 and large stratospheric chlorine loadings. Comparable depletion is likely to recur because stratospheric cooling16,17 and elevated chlorine concentrations5,18 are expected to persist for several decades.

Date: 1997
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/39564 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:389:y:1997:i:6652:d:10.1038_39564

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/39564

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().