NIH's way of setting priorities endorsed

Meredith Wadman

Nature, 1998, vol. 392, issue 6672, 116-116

Abstract: washington A panel charged with deciding if and how the the US National Institutes of Health should change how it sets research priorities seems unlikely to recommend dramatic changes when it reports in early July.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/32254 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:392:y:1998:i:6672:d:10.1038_32254

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/32254

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().