Elasticity and rheology of iron above 220 GPa and the nature of the Earth's inner core

Ho-kwang Mao (), Jinfu Shu, Guoyin Shen, Russell J. Hemley, Baosheng Li and Anil K. Singh
Additional contact information
Ho-kwang Mao: Geophysical Laboratory and Center for High Presure Research, Carnegie Institution of Washington
Jinfu Shu: Geophysical Laboratory and Center for High Presure Research, Carnegie Institution of Washington
Guoyin Shen: Consortium for Advanced Radiation Sources, University of Chicago
Russell J. Hemley: Geophysical Laboratory and Center for High Presure Research, Carnegie Institution of Washington
Baosheng Li: Center for High Pressure Research, Mineral Physics Institute, State University at Stony Brook
Anil K. Singh: National Aerospace Laboratories

Nature, 1998, vol. 396, issue 6713, 741-743

Abstract: Abstract Recent numerical-modelling and seismological results have raised new questions about the dynamics1,2 and magnetism3,4 of the Earth's core. Knowledge of the elasticity and texture of iron5,6 at core pressures is crucial for understanding the seismological observations, such as the low attenuation of seismic waves, thelow shear-wave velocity7,8 and the anisotropy of compressional-wave velocity9,10,11. The density and bulk modulus of hexagonal-close-packed iron have been previously measured to core pressures by static12 and dynamic13,14 methods. Here we study,using radial X-ray diffraction15 and ultrasonic techniques16, the shear modulus, single-crystal elasticity tensor, aggregate compressional- and shear-wave velocities, and orientation dependence of these velocities in iron. The inner core shear-wave velocity is lower than the aggregate shear-wave velocity of iron, suggesting the presence of low-velocity components or anelastic effects in the core. Observation of a strong lattice strain anisotropy in iron samples indicates a large (∼24%) compressional-wave anisotropy under the isostress assumption, and therefore a perfect alignment of crystals6 would not be needed to explain the seismic observations. Alternatively the strain anisotropy may indicate stress variation due to preferred slip systems.

Date: 1998
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/25506 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:396:y:1998:i:6713:d:10.1038_25506

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/25506

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().