EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Multi-gas assessment of the Kyoto Protocol

John Reilly, R. Prinn, J. Harnisch, J. Fitzmaurice, H. Jacoby, D. Kicklighter, J. Melillo, P. Stone, A. Sokolov and C. Wang
Additional contact information
R. Prinn: Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
J. Harnisch: Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
J. Fitzmaurice: Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
H. Jacoby: Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
D. Kicklighter: The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory
J. Melillo: The Ecosystems Center, Marine Biological Laboratory
P. Stone: Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
A. Sokolov: Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
C. Wang: Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Nature, 1999, vol. 401, issue 6753, 549-555

Abstract: Abstract The Kyoto Protocol allows reductions in emissions of several ‘greenhouse’ gases to be credited against a CO2-equivalent emissions limit, calculated using ‘global warming potential’ indices for each gas. Using an integrated global-systems model, it is shown that a multi-gas control strategy could greatly reduce the costs of fulfilling the Kyoto Protocol compared with a CO2-only strategy. Extending the Kyoto Protocol to 2100 without more severe emissions reductions shows little difference between the two strategies in climate and ecosystem effects. Under a more stringent emissions policy, the use of global warming potentials as applied in the Kyoto Protocol leads to considerably more mitigation of climate change for multi-gas strategies than for the—supposedly equivalent—CO2-only control, thus emphasizing the limits of global warming potentials as a tool for political decisions.

Date: 1999
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (52)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/44069 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:401:y:1999:i:6753:d:10.1038_44069

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/44069

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:nat:nature:v:401:y:1999:i:6753:d:10.1038_44069