Extrapolating movement without retinal motion
John Schlag (),
Rick H. Cai,
Andrews Dorfman,
Ali Mohempour and
Madeleine Schlag-Rey
Additional contact information
John Schlag: School of Medicine, UCLA
Rick H. Cai: School of Medicine, UCLA
Andrews Dorfman: School of Medicine, UCLA
Ali Mohempour: School of Medicine, UCLA
Madeleine Schlag-Rey: School of Medicine, UCLA
Nature, 2000, vol. 403, issue 6765, 38-39
Abstract:
Abstract In contrast to the perception of a stationary object that is briefly flashed in the dark, a continuously visible moving object is seen as being ahead of its actual position at the time of the flash. An explanation for this simple effect, in which a stimulus moving on the retina is seen as being further along its path and not where it was in space when its signal impinged on the retina, is keenly debated1,2,3,4,5,6. We show here that this illusion is not just limited to retinal motion, and that perceptual mislocalization occurs even when stimulus motion is inferred entirely from extra-retinal information, for example by movement of the observer's head or whole body, without retinal motion. The phenomenon may therefore rely on a much more general mechanism.
Date: 2000
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/47402 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:403:y:2000:i:6765:d:10.1038_47402
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/
DOI: 10.1038/47402
Access Statistics for this article
Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper
More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().