Vets asked valuable questions about foot-and-mouth measures

R. G. Eddy
Additional contact information
R. G. Eddy: Royal College of Veterinary Surgeons

Nature, 2001, vol. 412, issue 6846, 477-477

Abstract: Opposition was to a rigid policy, not to epidemiologists.

Date: 2001
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/35087748 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:412:y:2001:i:6846:d:10.1038_35087748

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/35087748

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().