How did brains evolve?

Robert A. Barton ()
Additional contact information
Robert A. Barton: Evolutionary Anthropology Research Group, University of Durham

Nature, 2002, vol. 415, issue 6868, 134-135

Abstract: Abstract Three reports on mammalian brain evolution1,2,3 analyse the same comparative data on brain component volumes4 but come to partially conflicting conclusions. Clark et al.3 conclude from their analysis of volumetric brain proportions (“cerebro-types”) that cerebellum size is invariant across mammalian taxonomic groups, the neocortex and cerebellum do not co-vary in size (in contradiction to ref. 1), and cerebrotype-based measures identify directional changes in brain architecture. Here I provide evidence that calls each of these conclusions into question. The failure of the cerebrotype measure to identify species differences in brain architecture that are independent of gross brain size undermines the proposal by Clark et al. that it could be useful for detecting evolutionary patterns and phylogenetic relationships.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/415134a Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:415:y:2002:i:6868:d:10.1038_415134a

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/415134a

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().