Low host specificity of herbivorous insects in a tropical forest

Vojtech Novotny (), Yves Basset, Scott E. Miller, George D. Weiblen, Birgitta Bremer, Lukas Cizek and Pavel Drozd
Additional contact information
Vojtech Novotny: University of South Bohemia
Yves Basset: Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Scott E. Miller: National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution
George D. Weiblen: University of Minnesota, 220 Biological Sciences Center
Birgitta Bremer: Bergius Foundation at the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Lukas Cizek: University of South Bohemia
Pavel Drozd: University of Ostrava

Nature, 2002, vol. 416, issue 6883, 841-844

Abstract: Abstract Two decades of research1,2,3,4 have not established whether tropical insect herbivores are dominated by specialists or generalists. This impedes our understanding of species coexistence in diverse rainforest communities. Host specificity and species richness of tropical insects are also key parameters in mapping global patterns of biodiversity1,4,5. Here we analyse data for over 900 herbivorous species feeding on 51 plant species in New Guinea and show that most herbivorous species feed on several closely related plant species. Because species-rich genera are dominant in tropical floras, monophagous herbivores are probably rare in tropical forests. Furthermore, even between phylogenetically distant hosts, herbivore communities typically shared a third of their species. These results do not support the classical view that the coexistence of herbivorous species in the tropics is a consequence of finely divided plant resources; non-equilibrium models of tropical diversity6 should instead be considered. Low host specificity of tropical herbivores reduces global estimates of arthropod diversity from 31 million (ref. 1) to 4–6 million species. This finding agrees with estimates based on taxonomic collections, reconciling an order of magnitude discrepancy between extrapolations of global diversity based on ecological samples of tropical communities with those based on sampling regional faunas7,8.

Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.nature.com/articles/416841a Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:nat:nature:v:416:y:2002:i:6883:d:10.1038_416841a

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.nature.com/

DOI: 10.1038/416841a

Access Statistics for this article

Nature is currently edited by Magdalena Skipper

More articles in Nature from Nature
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().